<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Absolute Gentleman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.absolutegentleman.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.absolutegentleman.com</link>
	<description>frank tempone's literary project</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on My Date with Amy Hempel by Molly</title>
		<link>http://www.absolutegentleman.com/2008/09/01/my-date-with-amy-hempel/#comment-2673</link>
		<dc:creator>Molly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.absolutegentleman.com/?p=147#comment-2673</guid>
		<description>I know, I was pointing out, some good volunteers did come from that reading. Tim Callahan got involved because of it, and I think Erin Floriani too? But yeah, there were a lot of people at that party and I doubt I ever saw any of them again.  

And I like the idea that Amy Hempel absolutely refuses to read in Massachusetts; I kind of wish it was true, that she had some kind of blood feud with the whole state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know, I was pointing out, some good volunteers did come from that reading. Tim Callahan got involved because of it, and I think Erin Floriani too? But yeah, there were a lot of people at that party and I doubt I ever saw any of them again.  </p>
<p>And I like the idea that Amy Hempel absolutely refuses to read in Massachusetts; I kind of wish it was true, that she had some kind of blood feud with the whole state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Date with Amy Hempel by Michael Kimball</title>
		<link>http://www.absolutegentleman.com/2008/09/01/my-date-with-amy-hempel/#comment-2668</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kimball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.absolutegentleman.com/?p=147#comment-2668</guid>
		<description>Nice, and yes, I agree--Amy Hempel is funny, charming, and brilliant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice, and yes, I agree&#8211;Amy Hempel is funny, charming, and brilliant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Date with Amy Hempel by Vivian</title>
		<link>http://www.absolutegentleman.com/2008/09/01/my-date-with-amy-hempel/#comment-2627</link>
		<dc:creator>Vivian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 02:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.absolutegentleman.com/?p=147#comment-2627</guid>
		<description>"...an interview I did for a literary magazine."
--Which one? McSweeney's? Paris Review?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;an interview I did for a literary magazine.&#8221;<br />
&#8211;Which one? McSweeney&#8217;s? Paris Review?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Date with Amy Hempel by frank</title>
		<link>http://www.absolutegentleman.com/2008/09/01/my-date-with-amy-hempel/#comment-2622</link>
		<dc:creator>frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 23:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.absolutegentleman.com/?p=147#comment-2622</guid>
		<description>You've done a significant amount for Word Street, Molly...You know I'm not talking about you...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve done a significant amount for Word Street, Molly&#8230;You know I&#8217;m not talking about you&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Date with Amy Hempel by Molly</title>
		<link>http://www.absolutegentleman.com/2008/09/01/my-date-with-amy-hempel/#comment-2620</link>
		<dc:creator>Molly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.absolutegentleman.com/?p=147#comment-2620</guid>
		<description>Her friend's name was Paola. And though I don't do much Word St. stuff lately, I did get involved originally because of the Eggers/Shepard reading. And I have a suspicion I may know who the girl was, but I could be completely wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Her friend&#8217;s name was Paola. And though I don&#8217;t do much Word St. stuff lately, I did get involved originally because of the Eggers/Shepard reading. And I have a suspicion I may know who the girl was, but I could be completely wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In Search of J.D. Salinger, Part Two by frank</title>
		<link>http://www.absolutegentleman.com/2008/08/27/in-search-of-jd-salinger-part-two/#comment-2460</link>
		<dc:creator>frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.absolutegentleman.com/?p=161#comment-2460</guid>
		<description>Jay, I'm not sure you're embracing the importance of the A-Team enough. I only mentioned the name B.A. Baracus, so you obviously have watched the show. I think you should revisit the series and consider changing your opinion of me. Please?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay, I&#8217;m not sure you&#8217;re embracing the importance of the A-Team enough. I only mentioned the name B.A. Baracus, so you obviously have watched the show. I think you should revisit the series and consider changing your opinion of me. Please?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In Search of J.D. Salinger, Part Two by J Savage</title>
		<link>http://www.absolutegentleman.com/2008/08/27/in-search-of-jd-salinger-part-two/#comment-2456</link>
		<dc:creator>J Savage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.absolutegentleman.com/?p=161#comment-2456</guid>
		<description>No, the point about your A-Team allusion wasn't that it made you a harsh critic; it makes you a hack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, the point about your A-Team allusion wasn&#8217;t that it made you a harsh critic; it makes you a hack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In Search of J.D. Salinger, Part Two by frank</title>
		<link>http://www.absolutegentleman.com/2008/08/27/in-search-of-jd-salinger-part-two/#comment-2455</link>
		<dc:creator>frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 17:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.absolutegentleman.com/?p=161#comment-2455</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your thoughtful response to my entry, Tom. Yeah, my comments are a little too harsh to throw around without substantiating them. My information comes from constant thoughts while reading Wolfe's work: Steinbeck and Kerouac already did all of this and THIS is now called the New Journalism? I had a hard time with the packaging of the whole movement, the hat, the white suit, and his prose that seemed lifted from stuff done already. A good blog to help make my point would be to put some of his paragraphs next to Kerouac's. I see that Tom Wolfe is number one on your favorite author's section, so I know I don't have the depth of knowledge you do regarding Wolfe's work. But you're right: the comment was made rashly, probably in a subconscious desire to rile people. I'll see you over at your blog. Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your thoughtful response to my entry, Tom. Yeah, my comments are a little too harsh to throw around without substantiating them. My information comes from constant thoughts while reading Wolfe&#8217;s work: Steinbeck and Kerouac already did all of this and THIS is now called the New Journalism? I had a hard time with the packaging of the whole movement, the hat, the white suit, and his prose that seemed lifted from stuff done already. A good blog to help make my point would be to put some of his paragraphs next to Kerouac&#8217;s. I see that Tom Wolfe is number one on your favorite author&#8217;s section, so I know I don&#8217;t have the depth of knowledge you do regarding Wolfe&#8217;s work. But you&#8217;re right: the comment was made rashly, probably in a subconscious desire to rile people. I&#8217;ll see you over at your blog. Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In Search of J.D. Salinger, Part Two by Tom Sutpen</title>
		<link>http://www.absolutegentleman.com/2008/08/27/in-search-of-jd-salinger-part-two/#comment-2454</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Sutpen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.absolutegentleman.com/?p=161#comment-2454</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure where you're getting your information on Tom Wolfe, but he did not slither (or worm) his way onto the Merry Prankster bus, nor did he make a pretense of being anything other than what he was: a professional journalist. What's more, he did not get high with his subjects (in this respect you might be confusing him with Hunter S. Thompson, who believed in actively taking part in whatever he was covering). Wolfe certainly told us about it . . . in what is still some of the most electrifying prose an American writer has rendered in the last 50 years . . . but he never claimed that New Journalism was entirely new, merely that it broke away from then-prevailing standards of news reporting.

Your most serious charge, however, is still unaddressed (and I suspect it was made rashly): In what respect is Tom Wolfe any kind of a thief?

Side note: Excellent Salinger piece. Though you realize he's probably got security devices stashed all over those woods. I doubt if you would have got closer to his abode without some kind of silent alarm being set off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure where you&#8217;re getting your information on Tom Wolfe, but he did not slither (or worm) his way onto the Merry Prankster bus, nor did he make a pretense of being anything other than what he was: a professional journalist. What&#8217;s more, he did not get high with his subjects (in this respect you might be confusing him with Hunter S. Thompson, who believed in actively taking part in whatever he was covering). Wolfe certainly told us about it . . . in what is still some of the most electrifying prose an American writer has rendered in the last 50 years . . . but he never claimed that New Journalism was entirely new, merely that it broke away from then-prevailing standards of news reporting.</p>
<p>Your most serious charge, however, is still unaddressed (and I suspect it was made rashly): In what respect is Tom Wolfe any kind of a thief?</p>
<p>Side note: Excellent Salinger piece. Though you realize he&#8217;s probably got security devices stashed all over those woods. I doubt if you would have got closer to his abode without some kind of silent alarm being set off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In Search of J.D. Salinger, Part Two by Rapunzel</title>
		<link>http://www.absolutegentleman.com/2008/08/27/in-search-of-jd-salinger-part-two/#comment-2453</link>
		<dc:creator>Rapunzel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.absolutegentleman.com/?p=161#comment-2453</guid>
		<description>I pity the fool who doesn't appreciate a well-placed A-team reference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I pity the fool who doesn&#8217;t appreciate a well-placed A-team reference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
